Unpacking the Election
With the election of Doug Ford and the PCs, Ontario now has a truckload of baggage. We have a lot of unpacking to do.
This time the polls got it right. Voters wanted a change in government. Even before Ford moved into the void created by Patrick Brown’s troubles, a majority was in sight for the Conservatives. The New Democrats have doubled their seats to form the Official Opposition. The Liberals lost official party status and the Greens won a seat.
This time the polls got it right. Voters wanted a change in government. Even before Ford moved into the void created by Patrick Brown’s troubles, a majority was in sight for the Conservatives. The New Democrats have doubled their seats to form the Official Opposition. The Liberals lost official party status and the Greens won a seat.
In the three party splits in every Ontario
election since 1943, solid majorities are given to parties that win
between 38 and 46%. In the final count, Ford won 41% and pushed the NDP back to
34% from the height of 39% reached mid-campaign (with the exception of two outliers who had them at 42% and 47%.) There was a real chance that
the NDP could overtake the Conservatives under Ford’s flawed leadership but its momentum stalled.
A week before the election, the NDP was
levitating beyond its natural base of support. It was appealing to a group of
voters who had likely never voted NDP. Kathleen Wynne could have rallied
progressives to stop Ford and to secure her legacy. Instead, she told voters to
think of Ford and Horwath as equally unfit to govern.
David Miller, former mayor of Toronto, put it this way on Twitter: “The real agony is that [the Liberals] campaigned for a week in a way that elected a government that will undo their agenda: rather than one that would have kept it.” This move, combined with the PC negative ads, put the NDP back on familiar ground. In military terms, the NDP surge got beyond its supply lines. It simply didn’t have the organization to maintain the momentum.
David Miller, former mayor of Toronto, put it this way on Twitter: “The real agony is that [the Liberals] campaigned for a week in a way that elected a government that will undo their agenda: rather than one that would have kept it.” This move, combined with the PC negative ads, put the NDP back on familiar ground. In military terms, the NDP surge got beyond its supply lines. It simply didn’t have the organization to maintain the momentum.
Under this kind of pressure, Liberal and
truly Progressive Conservative voters can move left. In my experience, most return home. That’s what happened this time.
Conservatives have governed Ontario for 50
of the past 75 years. They have won 15 out of 22 elections. Their formula is to
cater to corporate and suburban Toronto and rural or small town Ontario as
they did this time. The character of this government, however, is already
different because Ford is not who he appears to some voters to be. He’s more of a Trump-styled American than he
is a Canadian. He’s part of the one per cent not the 99%. He inherited a
successful business, didn't build one. He acts like he’s above the law not a
law-abiding citizen. He’s more of an authoritarian than a libertarian, and a man whose racist and sexist attitudes are so thinly veiled as
to provide no cover at all.
According to the polls, half the PC voters backed
the party despite Doug Ford not because of him. Luckily, our parliamentary
system does not concentrate power in the role of party leader. The British
Conservative Party’s caucus ousted Margaret Thatcher when her arrogance became
too much for them to bear. If Doug Ford creates a huge sideshow with his
personal foibles or drives policy too far right, it is much simpler for the PCs
to get rid of him than for the Republicans to get rid of Trump.
I’d like this election to be remembered mostly
for what happened on the other side of the House – on the Opposition benches. There
is every reason to believe that the historic success of the NDP, the scale of
the Liberal defeat, and the election of a first Green MPP may turn out to be
important steps towards the realignment of Ontario politics.
Last Thursday, the NDP delivered its best
results since 1943 with the exception of the 1990 victory. Seats were won in
every corner of the province, building on bases of support established in the
last election. The new NDP caucus is refreshing and exciting. It includes more
talented women and people of colour who are a reflection of Ontario’s present
and promising future. Its core supporters are re-energized after 23 years in a
kind of political wilderness. It has also attracted many impressive young people
who have bold, challenging visions and modern organizing skills.
Winning 40 seats out of 124, the NDP came
second in 61 other ridings. It came within five percent of winning in many
others. The Broadbent Institute’s Andrew Jackson observed that the NDP managed
to form an electoral coalition of traditional industrial areas and northern
Ontario, and highly urban Ontario in this election. Building such a base has
eluded most social democratic parties around the world, which have tended to
lose their historic base to the right, he says.
Effectively used, Official Opposition
status is a big deal. Only four times in 21 elections since 1943 did the CCF or
NDP win Official Opposition in Ontario. Unlike this time, they were accompanied
in opposition by a strong Liberal contingent with official party status in the
Legislature. The Liberals never lost its place in the public mind as the natural
alternative to the Conservatives. This could change as a result of this
election.
The scale of the Liberal loss is historic. The
Liberals have been reduced to a small rump in Ottawa, a single seat outpost
in Thunder Bay, and three seats in a Toronto no-man’s-land tucked between the PC
suburbs and the NDP sweep of downtown Toronto. The Liberals have been
completely wiped out in the rest of the province. They won seven seats in total
and were second in only 22 out of 124. They have a long way to come back. Never
have they been down to single digit in seats. Never have they been below 20% in
the popular vote. Never have they lost official party status, forcing their
members to operate as individual independents under House rules unless the Ford
government decides to be benevolent.
Political generosity will not come easily
to the PCs or the NDP for that matter. Ford’s decision will be entirely based
on political considerations. In my view, out of respect for the traditional
place of the Liberal Party in Ontario’s history and for those who voted Liberal,
the rule on official status should be modified. They are a political party and
should be able to participate in the legislature as one.
That move may not be enough to save them.
If the NDP uses its new position effectively, it will overshadow the Liberals
at every turn. It can demonstrate that it is a strong, sensible, popular and principled
alternative to the Conservatives. It can articulate an inspiring and pragmatic
social democratic vision consistent with the values of a majority of the
electorate and the lone voice of the Green Party in the Legislature. It can
recruit strong candidates and a cadre of advisors who can plan for the next
election and position the NDP in the tradition of western Canadian NDP
governments. It can deepen its organizational roots especially in target areas
of the electorate while contributing to the global movement for social and
economic justice.
This is the opportunity that awaits the NDP
in the 42nd Ontario Legislature.
This was, of course, an historic opportunity for the PCs and Ford, given the animosity of the electorate for Wynne. But it was also an historic opportunity for the NDP and Horwath, given the animosity of the electorate for both Wynne and Ford.
ReplyDelete1. In the last Ontario election, the ONDP moved to the right; this time quite far to the left. For example, Horwath promised to never use back-to-work legislation (announced just before the start of party's slide in the polls). Did that move reinforce stereotypes of the NDP and undermine the ONDP campaign?
2. Did the BC NDP's continued opposition to the pipeline (joined by the Federal NDP) undermine the ONDP?
3. Given the return of the PCs from devastation under Kim Campbell, and the return of the federal Liberals (following Ignatieff), is your description of the "historic" Liberal defeat possibly a bit too jubilant?